Project Aingeal mark

System Architecture

A conceptual, governance-aligned architecture designed to support clarity and accountability-ready, tamper-evident recordkeeping for user-owned records and user-provided digital artifacts without surveillance or monitoring.

This page describes architectural intent and boundaries only. No operational workflows, implementation details, or execution-enabling material are disclosed.

Architectural Intent

Project Aingeal is organized to preserve decision-grade records about user-provided artifacts and user-owned records. The focus is not classification or attribution. The focus is integrity and clarity: what changed, when it changed, and why the record was authorized at the time it was created.

Principle: If a system cannot produce a decision-grade record at the moment an action occurs, it will be forced into unreliable reconstruction later — and operational speed collapses.

User Authority Boundary

Record creation occurs only through explicit user initiation or a user-configured internal condition. The architecture does not observe, monitor, or infer activity outside of user-authorized actions.

  • No passive observation
  • No background monitoring
  • No automated collection
An “event,” as used herein, refers to an explicit user action or a user-configured internal condition and does not include passive observation or monitoring of system activity.

Evidence & Record Structure

Records are treated as structured artifacts with continuity across time. The architecture emphasizes consistency, traceability, and explainability so a later reviewer can understand the record without guesswork or reconstruction.

Integrity and continuity signals support reviewability without asserting interpretation, enforcement, or control.

Governance-Aligned Design

Architectural boundaries are defined in alignment with the project’s governance framework. Scope limits and controlled disclosure are treated as structural requirements, not optional guidelines.

  • Clear scope limitations
  • Defined disclosure boundaries
  • Non-operational public representation
Litmus test: Does this preserve what changed, when it changed, and why it was authorized at the time, without later reconstruction?
← Back to overview